![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7dWCE3lJ-9XgLR1BxBfkdpsd4zyAZAdUiO49NyQBD_pFvRazoB2-mjFfip_e7i9Q9QkZv-aQnzydN_RnNMvKSXsAsJLdq7OtrAX3qqOLIGajCuJ6841-G-yPVfNCtoVCW2MpxmaX6xt7M/s400/10001.jpg)
Well - kinda close....Phil became a Leaf for the 2009-10 season. Funny thing, looking up his stats, I think I know what sticks out that I question about him. A career +/- of -86. Yikes. I know a good part of that can be based on the teams you play with, but over a career of 10 plus years so far, and not all on sub par teams....yikes.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgzJZySGxbE-KYBPG824SnXNqPArYpKziCA-kHZowfJzioXkNaRWqVSHU72hkis_LYz0Vr8dbyk_wCxAXTsa5D4Zbklj_nDBN9xY53Pfykrk8w1y_Tb12_c9Q6vccajWjJ7GZZ-Orz28OPh/s320/10003.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgO_S7LdUUOXuHwCPCjCv6AponaAMXEgFUMJDI5SWOzTB2STaP4YnYJuj5PogBUb-kcY17RZAOi8Iyg7jfeTKCQnzkKNh7Uj19g7mV3ot_ViGcQNolC72qPU9WgyVQnSg1WMzhKUGOke7hG/s320/10005.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhcdB0vYH-gzI_lgKi1OE5RbIXk1GZFGZVtef8z_0j2KNF-SsK4d9VCnSCp91vavyEe-yaQrOgUGJgNjSwus60milkaOkcwxHEo2ORvLyUubzYfg38L6BbFI4NcLyEpvi3xZecErpHlv0jL/s320/10002.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgrTuFRQSNHNUM9Zhl9N3X0JzH3yU7ac3lN0QWoquB1K_fq5ne75dRMnFpNbOKMFQZmnTuSTM0nQ0H0iEpWpvCV5JamVaO49Ky6_r7QgmM9qt9ErwNEHQysQgVPdzigRuBmBvgODPkwlJYv/s320/10004.jpg)
Lots of red, not much, blue, but a heck of a lot of star power in this pack.
5 Packs, 23 cards, 69 points.
Wow. -86 +/- rating is eye opening. But there are some notable hall of famers with worse career +/- ratings: Dale Hawerchuk (-98), Bernie Federko (-131), Craig Patrick (-133), and Harry Howell (-152).
ReplyDeleteWould be interesting to see that in comparison to team plus minus because being a -50 when playing for a Stanley Cup champ is much different than being a -50 for a basement dweller.
Delete